<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Good, The Bad, The Emotional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://despinakarras.com/2009/05/the-good-the-bad-the-emotional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://despinakarras.com/2009/05/the-good-the-bad-the-emotional/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: appealtoheaven</title>
		<link>http://despinakarras.com/2009/05/the-good-the-bad-the-emotional/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>appealtoheaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://despinakarras.com/2009/05/the-good-the-bad-the-emotional/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>It just kills me that a Justice who favors basing a case on the Legislature, the group representing the will of the people, is considered a &#039;Right Wing Extremist.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s &#039;extreme&#039; to default to the written Law and the Constitution, and not personal feelings, experience, or any other arbitrary subjective whim? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Similar to what Thomas Sowell remarked, would an Umpire be considered an &#039;extremist&#039; for calling balls and strikes based as close to the rules as possible, regardless of his personal experience and empathy?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I agree with you D.K. As with journalism, while total objectivity may not be humanly possible - it should be the goal which is strived for. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In my opinion, to call that view &#039;extremism,&#039; is absurd, and a perversion of language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just kills me that a Justice who favors basing a case on the Legislature, the group representing the will of the people, is considered a &#39;Right Wing Extremist.&quot;</p>
<p>It&#39;s &#39;extreme&#39; to default to the written Law and the Constitution, and not personal feelings, experience, or any other arbitrary subjective whim? </p>
<p>Similar to what Thomas Sowell remarked, would an Umpire be considered an &#39;extremist&#39; for calling balls and strikes based as close to the rules as possible, regardless of his personal experience and empathy?</p>
<p>I agree with you D.K. As with journalism, while total objectivity may not be humanly possible &#8211; it should be the goal which is strived for. </p>
<p>In my opinion, to call that view &#39;extremism,&#39; is absurd, and a perversion of language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

